Candidates
Candidates2
Local candidate pairs waiting for staff review.
BPPE Career
Admissions Representative
What is this page?
This page proves duplicate candidate review and merge planning for admissions leads, including email, phone, and name plus date-of-birth signals.
Use Sev3 if duplicate signals, survivor choices, or preservation rules are unclear and Sev4 for labels, ordering, or proof-copy feedback. This panel does not submit a support case.
Sev1: Critical outage or data-risk emergency
Target: 1-hour response, 24/7 paging during pilot
Sev2: Major workflow blocked
Target: 4 business hours
Sev3: Standard product question or non-urgent issue
Target: 1 business day
Sev4: How-to, cosmetic, or future enhancement
Target: 2 business days
These preview controls are placeholders. Real AI answers, search, walkthroughs, and support submission come in later tickets.
Static proof preview
Real notification feeds, delivery, and preferences arrive in a later ticket.
Mina Patel
mina.patel@otto-fixture.test
Switch local proof role
This changes only the local shell proof. Production role changes remain server-validated future work.
Search is a keyboard-focusable skeleton. No real index or permissioned search results are implemented in this ticket.
Admissions CRM
A local proof surface for duplicate candidate review, email/phone/name+DOB signals, merge preview, preservation planning, and disabled merge actions.
Otto Fixture BPPE Career School · duplicate proof
Admissions Representative · Mina Patel
Admissions duplicates
Local proof of candidate review for duplicate leads and applicants. Staff can inspect email, phone, and name plus date-of-birth signals, preview merge field choices, and see preservation rules without writing data.
Candidates
Candidates2
Local candidate pairs waiting for staff review.
High risk
High risk1
Candidates above the high-risk local threshold.
Signals
Signals6
Signals across email, phone, and name plus DOB.
Conflicts
Conflicts5
Fields that require staff judgment.
Writes
Writes0
Merge writes stay disabled.
Pairs are sorted by score, with the riskiest pair selected for the merge preview below.
Score 96
Primary
Possible duplicate
Email · +42
ExactNormalized email matches exactly.
Phone · +34
ExactNormalized phone number matches exactly.
Name plus DOB · +20
StrongLegal name and date of birth match.
Review attribution and consent, then merge into Priya Shah when production merge execution exists.
Score 78
Primary
Possible duplicate
Email · +12
PossibleDifferent email, but same domain and preferred-name alias.
Phone · +34
ExactNormalized phone number matches exactly.
Name plus DOB · +32
StrongLegal name variant and date of birth match.
Confirm legal name and email ownership before merging into Evelyn Ross.
The preview shows survivor-field choices before any merge transaction, audit event, or record archive exists.
Selected pair
Field
Legal name
Same legal name.
Field
Exact normalized match.
Field
Source
Attribution needs policy review before a merge can write.
Field
Program
Same program interest.
Field
Consent
Keep richer existing consent until legal merge rules exist.
Merge review protects the no-copy admissions record by preserving history, tasks, consent, applications, and document context.
Timeline
Future merge should retain both histories in sequence.
Tasks
Existing follow-up task stays with the surviving record.
Consent
Both consent sources should remain auditable.
Actions
Merge execution, survivor rules, and audit events are later work.
Duplicate candidate status writes and reviewer notes are later.
Messaging templates, quiet hours, and communication events are later.
The production duplicate matching algorithm is not wired in this proof.
Proof boundary